I (Jeff) just finished reading Mark Savickas’ new book Career Counseling and in it, among other things, he makes a case for a change in how we as career practitioners see the development and implementation of vocational identity. Traditionally (and this has been the approach John and I have used to expand on the idea of vocational identity in this blog) vocational identity has been presented as something that is present, or pre-existing, but is hidden and thus needs to be discovered. As I see it, this is akin to having a lost brother, that one knows exists, and with some searching can be found and become a part of one’s everyday functioning. Savickas proposes, however, that vocational identity is, in fact, one’s vocational “thesis”, imposed over time on our experiences as we bring them to bear on the construction of the identity. He explains it as the pattern we impose on our everyday realities to guide us in various social contexts. Instead of a lost brother who becomes part of our functioning, this conceptualization of vocational identity resembles a brother created, rather than found, to fulfill one’s ongoing needs. This created entity would change with growth and experience to better match functioning.
In thinking about this conceptualization of identity, I have arrived at the conclusion that there are likely two important components to developing a vocational identity:
*The views expressed by our authors are personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views of the CCPA